Chow Group Of A Stack
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In algebraic geometry, the Chow group of a stack is a generalization of the
Chow group In algebraic geometry, the Chow groups (named after Wei-Liang Chow by ) of an algebraic variety over any field are algebro-geometric analogs of the homology of a topological space. The elements of the Chow group are formed out of subvarieties ( ...
of a variety or scheme to stacks. For a
quotient stack In algebraic geometry, a quotient stack is a stack that parametrizes equivariant objects. Geometrically, it generalizes a quotient of a scheme or a variety by a group: a quotient variety, say, would be a coarse approximation of a quotient stack. Th ...
X = /G/math>, the Chow group of ''X'' is the same as the ''G''-equivariant Chow group of ''Y''. A key difference from the theory of Chow groups of a variety is that a cycle is allowed to carry non-trivial automorphisms and consequently intersection-theoretic operations must take this into account. For example, the degree of a 0-cycle on a stack need not be an integer but is a rational number (due to non-trivial stabilizers).


Definitions

develops the basic theory (mostly over Q) for the Chow group of a (separated)
Deligne–Mumford stack In algebraic geometry, a Deligne–Mumford stack is a stack ''F'' such that Pierre Deligne and David Mumford introduced this notion in 1969 when they proved that moduli spaces of stable curves of fixed arithmetic genus are proper smooth Deligne ...
. There, the Chow group is defined exactly as in the classical case: it is the free abelian group generated by integral closed substacks modulo rational equivalence. If a stack ''X'' can be written as the
quotient stack In algebraic geometry, a quotient stack is a stack that parametrizes equivariant objects. Geometrically, it generalizes a quotient of a scheme or a variety by a group: a quotient variety, say, would be a coarse approximation of a quotient stack. Th ...
X = /G/math> for some quasi-projective variety ''Y'' with a linearized action of a linear algebraic group ''G'', then the Chow group of ''X'' is defined as the ''G''-equivariant Chow group of ''Y''. This approach is introduced and developed by Dan Edidin and William A. Graham, as well as Burt Totaro. Later Andrew Kresch (1999) extended the theory to a stack admitting a stratification by quotient stacks. For higher Chow groups (precursor of motivic homologies) of algebraic stacks, see Roy Joshua's Intersection Theory on Stacks:I and II


Examples

The calculations depend on definitions. Thus, here, we proceed somehow axiomatically. Specifically, we assume: given an algebraic stack ''X'' locally of finite type over a base field ''k'', # (homotopy-invariance) if ''E'' is a rank-''n'' vector bundle on ''X'', then A_(E) = A_(X). # for each integral substack ''Z'' of dimension < ''p'', A_p(X - Z) = A_p(X), a corollary of a localization sequence. These properties are valid if ''X'' is Deligne–Mumford and are expected to hold for any other reasonable theory. We take ''X'' to be the classifying stack B G, the stack of principal ''G''-bundles for a smooth linear algebraic group ''G''. By definition, it is the quotient stack /G/math>, where * is viewed as the stack associated to * = Spec ''k''. We approximate it as follows. Given an integer ''p'', choose a representation G \to GL(V) such that there is a ''G''-invariant open subset ''U'' of ''V'' on which ''G'' acts freely and the complement Z = V - U has codimension > - \operatorname G - p. Let * \times_G V be the quotient of * \times G by the action (x, v) \cdot g = (xg, g^ v). Note the action is free and so * \times_G V is a vector bundle over BG. By Property 1 applied to this vector bundle, :A_p(BG) = A_ (* \times_G V). Then, since * \times_G U = U/G, by Property 2, :A_(* \times_G V) = A_(U/G) since \dim /G= \dim Z - \dim G < \dim V + p. As a concrete example, let G = \mathbb_m and let it act on \mathbb^n by scaling. Then \mathbb_m acts freely on U = \mathbb^n - \. By the above calculation, for each pair of integers ''n'', ''p'' such that n+p \ge 0, :A_p(B \mathbb_m) = A_(\mathbb^). In particular, for every integer ''p'' ≥ 0, A_p(B \mathbb_m) = 0. In general, A_(\mathbb^n) = \mathbbh^k for the hyperplane class ''h'', h^k ''k''-times self-intersection and h^k =0 for negative ''k'' and so :A_p(B \mathbb_m) = \mathbb h^ where the right-hand side is independent of models used in the calculation (since different ''h''s correspond under the projections between projective spaces.) For p = -1 = \dim B \mathbb_m, the class h^0 = mathbb^/math>, any ''n'', may be thought of as the fundamental class of B \mathbb_m. Similarly, we have :A^*(B \mathbb_m) = \mathbb /math> where c = c_1(h) is the first Chern class of ''h'' (and ''c'' and ''h'' are identified when Chow groups and Chow rings of projective spaces are identified). Since h^k = c \cdot h^, we have that A_*(B \mathbb_m) is the free \mathbb /math>-module generated by h^0.


Virtual fundamental class

The notion originates in the Kuranishi theory in symplectic geometry. In § 2. of , given a DM stack ''X'' and ''C''''X'' the
intrinsic normal cone In algebraic geometry, the normal cone C_XY of a subscheme X of a scheme Y is a scheme analogous to the normal bundle or tubular neighborhood in differential geometry. Definition The normal cone or C_ of an embedding , defined by some sheaf of i ...
to ''X'', K. Behrend defines the virtual fundamental class of ''X'' as : = s_0^! _X/math> where ''s''0 is the zero-section of the cone determined by the
perfect obstruction theory In algebraic geometry, given a Deligne–Mumford stack ''X'', a perfect obstruction theory for ''X'' consists of: # a perfect two-term complex E = ^ \to E^0/math> in the derived category D(\text(X)_) of quasi-coherent étale sheaves on ''X'', and ...
and ''s''0! is the refined Gysin homomorphism defined just as in Fulton's "Intersection theory". The same paper shows that the degree of this class, morally the integration over it, is equal to the weighted Euler characteristic of the Behrend function of ''X''. More recent (circa 2017) approaches do this type of construction in the context of
derived algebraic geometry Derived algebraic geometry is a branch of mathematics that generalizes algebraic geometry to a situation where commutative rings, which provide local charts, are replaced by either differential graded algebras (over \mathbb), simplicial commutati ...
.§ 1.2.1. of


See also

*
Perfect obstruction theory In algebraic geometry, given a Deligne–Mumford stack ''X'', a perfect obstruction theory for ''X'' consists of: # a perfect two-term complex E = ^ \to E^0/math> in the derived category D(\text(X)_) of quasi-coherent étale sheaves on ''X'', and ...
*
Gromov–Witten invariant In mathematics, specifically in symplectic topology and algebraic geometry, Gromov–Witten (GW) invariants are rational numbers that, in certain situations, count pseudoholomorphic curves meeting prescribed conditions in a given symplectic man ...
* Cohomology of a stack


Notes


References

* * * * * * * * {{citation , last=Shen , first=Junliang , year=2014 , title=Construction of the Virtual Fundamental Class and Applications , url=https://people.math.ethz.ch/~jshen/files/JShen_Thesis.pdf


External links

* Virtual classes for the working mathematician
The classical number 2875 of lines on the quintic, as a DT invariantWhat is the main failure in using Naive Chow group in Artin StackLocal model of virtual fundamental cycle
*https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/virtual+fundamental+class
On the Virtual Fundamental Class
- a slide by Kai Behrend Algebraic geometry